8/23/2023 0 Comments BeneficenceAs Buchanan ( 2011) contends, the changes in spaces and technology afforded by the internet “has the potential to fundamentally disturb the extant models of human subjects research” (p. 83), paving the way for the creation of what she coins research ethics 2.0. The multi-paradigmatic and fluid nature of the social sciences prompts it to remain adaptable to its changing object of inquiry, our society, which now involves the internet (Hine 2005). However, the internet’s use in social science research is fraught with ethical and legal challenges, some of which appear to be more complex than what traditional research ethics can address. 2011 Savage and Burrows 2007 Townsend and Wallace 2016 Wilson et al. In the field of social science research, it is viewed by many as a rapidly developing and massively potent methodological tool due to its role in shaping the dynamics, locations, and embodiments of interactions and meaning construction (Jones 2011 Orton-Johnson 2010 Parker et al. The internet has been converted into what Castells ( 2001) describes as the fabric of our lives, revolutionizing the way people’s perceptions and interactions with their environment are reflected. We also seek to provide recommendations on how disciplinary associations can proceed to facilitate ethically sensitive internet research. With the rapidly evolving nature of internet technologies, this analysis is projected to contribute to the ongoing developments in research ethics in the social sciences by outlining the tensions and implications of the use of the internet as a methodological tool. However, the invocations of the principle of justice were rather implicit and reflect an important shift from the Belmont Report’s protectionist ethical position towards more situational and dialogic approaches. These seminal documents are meant to provide discipline-specific guidance for research design and implementation and are regarded as key references when conducting research online. Our analysis revealed that the principles of respect and beneficence were explicitly conveyed in the documents analysed, offering nuanced interpretations on issues of informed consent, privacy, and benefits and risks as well as providing recommendations for modifying traditional practices to fit the online setting. There may be additional versions of the Gold Cross that vary in manufacturer.The purpose of this article is to illuminate the conceptualisations and applications of the Belmont Report’s key ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice based on a document analysis of five of the most relevant disciplinary guidelines on internet research in the social sciences. All four versions feature an obverse inscription that translates to "Beneficence." The fourth version does not have a crown and features a reverse medallion with the national coat of arms and “Greek Republic” in full. These versions do not have a surmounting crown and feature reverse medallions without an inscription, or with the initials “ED” (the first letters to “Greek Republic”). The second and third versions were awarded from 1975 to 1984. It is surmounted by a royal crown and features a reverse medallion with the cypher of King George II. There are four versions of the Gold Cross The first was awarded from 1948 to 1973. It is conferred upon Greek and foreign women in recognition of meritorious acts of charity, distinguished philanthropic activities, and distinguished service in the fields of teaching, literature, and the arts. The Order of Beneficence was established by King Paul I on May 5, 1948.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |